The US Trade Representative proposed tariffs of up to 100% on Chinese ship-to-shore cranes, containers, and related parts. With no US manufacturers currently producing these cranes, it could take at least a decade to develop domestic capacity, according to Gene Seroka, executive director of the Port of Los Angeles. While European and Japanese alternatives exist, Seroka noted that options outside China are limited.

The move could significantly affect US ports and global supply chains, increasing expenses for terminal operators and potentially passing costs down to consumers. Although the tariffs may not have an immediate effect, since cranes typically last around 20 years, Seroka emphasized that the real issue is ensuring long-term competition, affordability, and broader participation in the market.

Industry groups, including the American Association of Port Authorities, opposed the tariffs and instead supported setting up production tax credits for US-made cargo-handling equipment.